From deficit-based support to flourishing: Integrating Islamic religious education and positive psychology for children with special needs

Authors

  • Mashdaria Huwaina Universitas Muhammadiyah Lampung, Indonesia
  • M. Ubaidillah Ridwanulloh Universitas Islam Negeri Syekh Wasil Kediri, Indonesia
  • Muhamad Yasin Universitas Islam Negeri Syekh Wasil Kediri, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55749/sdes.v1i1.195

Keywords:

Children with special needs, Flourishing, Islamic religious education, Positive psychology, Well-being

Abstract

Education for children with special needs is often framed through a deficit-based perspective that emphasizes limitations, barriers, and remediation. Although such support is necessary, it may overlook the emotional, moral, spiritual, and personal strengths that children need to develop meaningful learning experiences and positive self-understanding. This article proposes an alternative conceptual perspective by integrating Islamic Religious Education with positive psychology to support the holistic development of children with special needs. Using a literature-based conceptual approach, this study examines how Islamic values and positive psychology constructs can be connected to strengthen well-being, resilience, gratitude, optimism, self-confidence, and social relationships. The analysis shows that Islamic Religious Education can function not only as a subject for transmitting religious knowledge, but also as a transformative space for developing positive character and psychological strength. Concepts such as syukur or gratitude, sabar or patience, tawakkal or trust in God, compassion, and moral responsibility are closely related to positive psychology constructs such as positive emotion, meaning, resilience, engagement, and positive relationships. For children with special needs, this integration can be implemented through adaptive religious instruction, strength-based feedback, emotional support, meaningful routines, storytelling, reflective activities, and inclusive classroom interaction. The study contributes a conceptual foundation for positive and inclusive Islamic Religious Education that moves beyond deficit correction toward flourishing, dignity, and character formation among children with special needs.

References

1. American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed., text rev., Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. Doi: 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787

2. Ball, J., and Fazil, Q. (2013). Does Engagement in Meaningful Occupation Reduce Challenging Behavior in People with Intellectual Disabilities? A Systematic Review of the Literature, Journal of Intellectual Disabilities: JOID, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 64–77. Doi: 10.1177/1744629512473557

3. Billen, E. (2022). Improving the Understanding of Self-Regulation: Perspectives for Forensic Research and Practice, PhD Dissertation, Tilburg University

4. Bonta, J., and Andrews, D. A. (2023). The Psychology of Criminal Conduct, 7th ed., New York, NY: Routledge

5. Cohen, I. L., and Tsiouris, J. A. (2020). Triggers of Aggressive Behaviors in Intellectually Disabled Adults and Their Association with Autism, Medical Conditions, Psychiatric Disorders, Age and Sex: A Large-Scale Study, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, Vol. 50, No. 10, pp. 3748–3762. Doi: 10.1007/s10803-020-04424-4

6. Craik, C., Bryant, W., Ryan, A., Barclay, S., Brooke, N., Mason, A., and Russell, P. (2010). A Qualitative Study of Service User Experiences of Occupation in Forensic Mental Health, Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, Vol. 57, No. 5, pp. 339–344. Doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2010.00857.x

7. Delforterie, M. J., Hesper, B. L., and Didden, R. (2020). Psychometric Properties of the Dynamic Risk Outcome Scales (DROS) for Individuals with Mild Intellectual Disability or Borderline Intellectual Functioning and Externalising Behaviour Problems, Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities: JARID, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 662–672. Doi: 10.1111/jar.12546

8. De Vogel, V., and Didden, R. (2022). Victimization History in Female Forensic Psychiatric Patients with Intellectual Disabilities: Results from a Dutch Multicenter Study, Research in Developmental Disabilities, Vol. 122, 104179. Doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2022.104179

9. Farnworth, L., Nikitin, L., and Fossey, E. (2004). Being in a Secure Forensic Psychiatric Unit: Every Day is the Same, Killing Time or Making the Most of It, British Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 67, No. 10, pp. 430–438. Doi: 10.1177/030802260406701003

10. Frielink, N., Schuengel, C., and Embregts, P. J. C. M. (2018). Autonomy Support, Need Satisfaction, and Motivation for Support among Adults with Intellectual Disability: Testing a Self-Determination Theory Model, American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, Vol. 123, No. 1, pp. 33–49. Doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-123.1.33

11. Guina, J., Hernandez, C., Witherell, J., Cowan, A., Dixon, D., King, I., and Gentile, J. P. (2022). Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Criminality, and Criminal Responsibility, The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 358–368. Doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.210103-21

12. Harris, J. C. (2006). Intellectual Disability: Understanding Its Development, Causes, Classification, Evaluation, and Treatment, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Bai, C., Zhu, Q., and Sarkis, J. (2024). Do Blockchain Capabilities Help Overcome Supply and Operational Risks: Insights from Firm Market Returns during COVID-19, Omega, Vol. 126, 103049. Doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2024.103049

13. Hollomotz, A. (2018). Successful Interviews with People with Intellectual Disability, Qualitative Research, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 153–170. Doi: 10.1177/1468794117713810

14. Jahoda, A., Kemp, J., Riddell, S., and Banks, P. (2008). Feelings about Work: A Review of the Socio-Emotional Impact of Supported Employment on People with Intellectual Disabilities, Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 1–18. Doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2007.00365.x

15. Kaal, H. L., Nijman, H. L. I., and Moonen, X. M. H. (2015). Identifying Offenders with an Intellectual Disability in Detention in The Netherlands, Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 94–101. Doi: 10.1108/JIDOB-04-2015-0008

16. Kim, M., and Cheon, K. A. (2024). Exploring the Clinical Characteristics and Comorbid Disorders of Borderline Intellectual Functioning, Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 181–187. Doi: 10.5765/jkacap.240012

17. Littlewood, M., Dagnan, D., and Rodgers, J. (2018). Exploring the Emotion Regulation Strategies Used by Adults with Intellectual Disabilities, International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, Vol. 64, No. 3, pp. 204–211. Doi: 10.1080/20473869.2018.1466510

18. Orío-Aparicio, C., López-Escribano, C., and Bel-Fenellós, C. (2025). Borderline Intellectual Functioning: A Scoping Review, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research: JIDR, Vol. 69, No. 6, pp. 437–456. Doi: 10.1111/jir.13221

19. Quinn, S., Rhynas, S., Gowland, S., Cameron, L., Braid, N., and O’Connor, S. (2022). Risk for Intellectual Disability Populations in Inpatient Forensic Settings in the United Kingdom: A Literature Review, Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities: JARID, Vol. 35, No. 6, pp. 1267–1280. Doi: 10.1111/jar.13030

20. Ratti, V., Hassiotis, A., Crabtree, J., Deb, S., Gallagher, P., and Unwin, G. (2016). The Effectiveness of Person-Centred Planning for People with Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review, Research in Developmental Disabilities, Vol. 57, pp. 63–84. Doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2016.06.015

21. Ritchie, J., and Lewis, J. (2003). Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers, London: SAGE Publications.

22. Ryan, R. M., and Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being, The American Psychologist, Vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 68–78. Doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

23. Sumarni, S., Ramadhani, R., Sazaki, Y., Astika, R. T., Andika, W. D., and Prasetiyo, A. E. (2019). Development of “Child Friendly ICT” Textbooks to Improve Professional Competence of Teacher Candidates: A Case Study of Early Childhood Education Program Students, Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 643–658. Doi: 10.17478/jegys.596095

24. Huda, S., Muawanah, M., Munifah, M., Syazali, M., Palupi, E. K., Umam, R., and Tortop, H. S. (2020). Islamic Education in Supply Chain System by Prioritizing Manners as a Success Factor of Millennial Generation on Socializing, International Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 853–863. Doi: 10.59160/ijscm.v9i2.4727

25. Munifah, M., Huda, S., Hamida, U. D., Subandi, S., Syazali, M., and Umam, R. (2019). The Use of Management Strategies to Attract the Public’s Interest in Pesantren: A New Model for Pesantren Dynamics Study, International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, Vol. 8, pp. 363–383.

26. Sumarni, S., Pertiwi, S. T. Y., Rukiyah, A., Astika, W. D., Abdurrahman, R. T., and Umam, R. (2019). Behavior in Early Childhood (2–3) Years: A Case Study on the Use of Gadgets in Social Environments, International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, Vol. 8, No. 8, pp. 384–404

27. Huda, S., Suherman, Komarudin, Syazali, M., and Umam, R. (2020). The Effectiveness of Al-Qurun Teaching Model (ATM) Viewed from Gender Differences: The Impact on Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 1467, 012001. Doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1467/1/012001

28. Huda, S., Munifah, M., and Umam, R. (2020). Think Talk Write (TTW) Learning Model on Thinking Skills, Creativity, and Problem Solving, Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 25–32.

29. Munifah, M., Tsani, I., Yasin, M., Tortop, H. S., Palupi, E. K., and Umam, R. (2019). Management System of Education: Conceptual Similarity (Integration) between Japanese Learning System and Islamic Learning System in Indonesia, Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, Vol. 4, No. 2. Doi: 10.24042/tadris.v4i2.4893

30. Segeren, M. W., Fassaert, T. J. L., Kea, R., de Wit, M. A. S., and Popma, A. (2018). Exploring Differences in Criminogenic Risk Factors and Criminal Behavior between Young Adult Violent Offenders with and without Mild to Borderline Intellectual Disability, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, Vol. 62, No. 4, pp. 978–999. Doi: 10.1177/0306624X16674009

31. Tassé, M. J., Schalock, R. L., Balboni, G., Bersani, H., Borthwick-Duffy, S. A., Spreat, S., Thissen, D., Widaman, K. F., and Zhang, D. (2012). The Construct of Adaptive Behavior: Its Conceptualization, Measurement, and Use in the Field of Intellectual Disability, American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, Vol. 117, No. 4, pp. 291–303. Doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-117.4.291

Downloads

Published

2026-07-02